The federal government has gazumped a Labor policy announcement by moving to appoint a new disability discrimination commissioner.

Federal cabinet has agreed to appoint a full-time commissioner to advocate for the rights of people with disabilities, reversing a 2014 decision to abolish the role, which was absorbed into the age discrimination commissioner’s job.

It is understood the appointment will be announced next week.

The government has been facing pressure from advocates who argued disability-related complaints formed the Australian Human Rights Commission’s biggest caseload.

On Thursday Labor announced it would reinstate a full-time commissioner in government, but that would involve scrapping the position held by former human rights commissioner Tim Wilson.

“Pleased that the govt has again followed Labor’s lead and announced a f/t disability commissioner, straight after our announcement today,” the shadow attorney general, Mark Dreyfus, tweeted on Thursday.

Feeling lonely or just want to make new friends? Come join the MDM Club for free. The Club is our disability and NDIS community where you can chat in a safe, tolerant and respectful environment. Our Club members include people with autism, depression, anxiety, mental illness, blindness, deafness and many other disabilities.

It’s not uncommon for commissioners to serve dual roles: Graeme Innes, who was disability commissioner, also served as rights and race discrimination commissioner for two years.

Get Disability News In Your Inbox

- Advertisement -


    • Dale here – one of the owners.

      I normally wouldn’t approve or allow anonymous comments (it is clear you are using a fake email account in the moderation system) but I just want to clearly explain to everyone.

      We only republish full articles with approval from the original site or author and many authors have gladly given us approval.

      In other cases we publish an excerpt with a link to the original source and full credit to where the article comes from.

      In this case there is a clear link and acknowledgement at the bottom of the article excerpt stating the source as the Guardian and linking to the full original article.

      You obviously jumped to a conclusion without reading the whole page.

      Also the footer at the bottom of each page and post explains that we are currently curating other blogs and news sources and not yet publishing wholly original content. There is no attempt to hide what we are doing in any way.

      If you wish to make any further comment you will need to use your real identity.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here